Da gehe ich nicht mit. Antisemitismus ist zwar in Osteuropa insgesamt viel verbreiteter als in Mitteleuropa, aber die Ukraine gehört andererseits zu den Ländern mit den niedrigsten Statistiken antisemitischer Straftaten europaweit.
Weiterhin gibt es unter den ukrainischen Rechten (die ja aber bekanntlich ohnehin eine kleine Minderheit ausmachen) wohl Personen mit antisemitischen Einstellungen, dies ist aber dennoch nicht typisches Merkmal des ukrainischen Nationalismus. Es gibt reichlich Material dazu, viele Äußerungen Offizieller der ukrainischen Juden, die aber interessanterweise gern komplett ignoriert werden, um dann im nächsten Atemzug wieder die Behauptung zu bringen, in der Ukraine spiele der Antisemitismus eine besorgniserregend große Rolle.
Bitte hierzu einfach mal die Originalquellen konsultieren:
Offizielle Verlautbarungen des ukrainischen jüdischen Dachverbandes:
Zu den Versuchen der russischen Propaganda, den Eindruck von starkem Antisemitismus in der Ukraine zu erwecken:
Zuguterletzt finde ich bemerkenswert, was Dmytro Jarosch, Chef des Rechten Sektor und sicher kein gemäßigter Demokrat, zu dem Thema zu sagen hat:
Given his role as leader of the Trident (Tryzub) organization, which bears the name of Stepan Bandera, I expected a classical ethnonationalist position with a noticeable xenophobic color compatible with Svoboda’s slogan that “here, the Ukrainian is master.” While acknowledging many things his organization (it was hard to figure out when he was talking about Trident alone and when about Right Sector as a whole) has in common with Svoboda, Yarosh also said that he does not by any means accept “certain racist things” characteristic of Oleh Tyahnybok’s party. Yarosh based his reasoning on those who have just died for Ukraine, namely a Belarusian and an Armenian, saying that “they are much greater comrades for me than any, sorry, Communist cattle like Symonenko, who plays for Russia, yet is an ethnic Ukrainian.” As a true Banderite, he supplemented this current justification with the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) leader’s classic thesis that a Ukrianian nationalist should treat non-Ukrainians according to their stance on the Ukrainian struggle for national liberation: with loyalty, with neutrality, or with hostility. Many of today’s fighters for a free Ukraine may not like his citing Bandera, but I imagine that most would not disagree with the thesis itself.
Yarosh’s dislike of “racism,” which I did not expect from him, caused me to think about whether it is appropriate to describe Right Sector, along with Svoboda, as radical nationalists. It’s understandable why this description is attractive: faced with the need to name those who seem to be both radicals and nationalists, many journalists and analysts resort to combined terms like “radical nationalists” and “nationalist radicals.” These terms (which I have sometimes used too) are characteristic ofjournalism and public commentary, where there is no space for discussions about terminology. The second one could, in principle, be considered adequate for describing nationalist segments of the radical camp – if it weren’t used (and perceived) so often as a synonym of the first, which implies a radical variation of nationalism, and Yarosh’s explanation would refute such an implication or at least fundamentally correct it.
[...]
Quelle:
Nur eingeloggte Mitglieder sehen alle Links ...
Es genügt nicht, nur keine Gedanken zu haben, man muss auch unfähig sein, sie auszudrücken!